Ben,
Looking at your notes, it appears that your solution is to write your own terms() function for lme. It is easy to verify that the "varnames.fixed" attribute is not returned by the ususal terms function. Then I also need to write my own terms function for the survival and coxme pacakges? Because of the need to treat strata() terms in a special way I manipulate the formula/terms in nearly every routine. Extrapolating: every R package that tries to examine formulas and partition them into bits needs its own terms function? This does not look like a good solution to me. On 03/07/2018 07:39 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: > I knew I had seen this before but couldn't previously remember where. > https://github.com/lme4/lme4/issues/441 ... I initially fixed with > gsub(), but (pushed by Martin Maechler to do better) I eventually > fixed it by storing the original names of the model frame (without > backticks) as an attribute for later retrieval: > https://github.com/lme4/lme4/commit/56416fc8b3b5153df7df5547082835c5d5725e89. > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Thanks to Bill Dunlap for the clarification. On follow-up it turns out that >> this will be an issue for many if not most of the routines in the survival >> package: a lot of them look at the terms structure and make use of the >> dimnames of attr(terms, 'factors'), which also keeps the unneeded >> backquotes. Others use the term.labels attribute. To dodge this I will >> need to create a fixterms() routine which I call at the top of every single >> routine in the library. >> >> Is there a chance for a fix at a higher level? >> >> Terry T. >> >> >> >> On 03/05/2018 03:55 PM, William Dunlap wrote: >>> I believe this has to do terms() making "term.labels" (hence the dimnames >>> of "factors") >>> with deparse(), so that the backquotes are included for non-syntactic >>> names. The backquotes >>> are not in the column names of the input data.frame (nor model frame) so >>> you get a mismatch >>> when subscripting the data.frame or model.frame with elements of >>> terms()$term.labels. >>> >>> I think you can avoid the problem by adding right after >>> ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>> the line >>> ll <- gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>> >>> E.g., >>> >>> > d <- data.frame(check.names=FALSE, y=1/(1:5), `b$a$d`=sin(1:5)+2, `x y >>> z`=cos(1:5)+2) >>> > Terms <- terms( y ~ log(`b$a$d`) + `x y z` ) >>> > m <- model.frame(Terms, data=d) >>> > colnames(m) >>> [1] "y" "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>> > attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "`x y z`" >>> > ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>> > gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>> >>> It is a bit of a mess. >>> >>> >>> Bill Dunlap >>> TIBCO Software >>> wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel >>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>> >>> A user reported a problem with the survdiff function and the use of >>> variables that >>> contain a space. Here is a simple example. The same issue occurs in >>> survfit for the >>> same reason. >>> >>> lung2 <- lung >>> names(lung2)[1] <- "in st" # old name is inst >>> survdiff(Surv(time, status) ~ `in st`, data=lung2) >>> Error in `[.data.frame`(m, ll) : undefined columns selected >>> >>> In the body of the code the program want to send all of the right-hand >>> side variables >>> forward to the strata() function. The code looks more or less like >>> this, where m is >>> the model frame >>> >>> Terms <- terms(m) >>> index <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>> if (length(index) ==0) X <- rep(1L, n) # no coariates >>> else X <- strata(m[index]) >>> >>> For the variable with a space in the name the term.label is "`in st`", >>> and the >>> subscript fails. >>> >>> Is this intended behaviour or a bug? The issue is that the name of >>> this column in the >>> model frame does not have the backtics, while the terms structure does >>> have them. >>> >>> Terry T. >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel> >>> >>> >> ______________________________________________ >> [hidden email] mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
Meant to respond to this but forgot.
I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to the terms() (a vector of the names of the constructed model matrix), thus preserving the information at the point when it was available. I do agree that it would be preferable to have an upstream fix ... On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel <[hidden email]> wrote: > Ben, > > > Looking at your notes, it appears that your solution is to write your own > terms() function > for lme. It is easy to verify that the "varnames.fixed" attribute is not > returned by the > ususal terms function. > > Then I also need to write my own terms function for the survival and coxme > pacakges? > Because of the need to treat strata() terms in a special way I manipulate > the > formula/terms in nearly every routine. > > Extrapolating: every R package that tries to examine formulas and partition > them into bits > needs its own terms function? This does not look like a good solution to > me. > > On 03/07/2018 07:39 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: >> >> I knew I had seen this before but couldn't previously remember where. >> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/issues/441 ... I initially fixed with >> gsub(), but (pushed by Martin Maechler to do better) I eventually >> fixed it by storing the original names of the model frame (without >> backticks) as an attribute for later retrieval: >> >> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/commit/56416fc8b3b5153df7df5547082835c5d5725e89. >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel >> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks to Bill Dunlap for the clarification. On follow-up it turns out >>> that >>> this will be an issue for many if not most of the routines in the >>> survival >>> package: a lot of them look at the terms structure and make use of the >>> dimnames of attr(terms, 'factors'), which also keeps the unneeded >>> backquotes. Others use the term.labels attribute. To dodge this I will >>> need to create a fixterms() routine which I call at the top of every >>> single >>> routine in the library. >>> >>> Is there a chance for a fix at a higher level? >>> >>> Terry T. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 03/05/2018 03:55 PM, William Dunlap wrote: >>>> >>>> I believe this has to do terms() making "term.labels" (hence the >>>> dimnames >>>> of "factors") >>>> with deparse(), so that the backquotes are included for non-syntactic >>>> names. The backquotes >>>> are not in the column names of the input data.frame (nor model frame) so >>>> you get a mismatch >>>> when subscripting the data.frame or model.frame with elements of >>>> terms()$term.labels. >>>> >>>> I think you can avoid the problem by adding right after >>>> ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>> the line >>>> ll <- gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>>> >>>> E.g., >>>> >>>> > d <- data.frame(check.names=FALSE, y=1/(1:5), `b$a$d`=sin(1:5)+2, `x >>>> y >>>> z`=cos(1:5)+2) >>>> > Terms <- terms( y ~ log(`b$a$d`) + `x y z` ) >>>> > m <- model.frame(Terms, data=d) >>>> > colnames(m) >>>> [1] "y" "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>>> > attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "`x y z`" >>>> > ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>> > gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>>> >>>> It is a bit of a mess. >>>> >>>> >>>> Bill Dunlap >>>> TIBCO Software >>>> wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel >>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> A user reported a problem with the survdiff function and the use of >>>> variables that >>>> contain a space. Here is a simple example. The same issue occurs >>>> in >>>> survfit for the >>>> same reason. >>>> >>>> lung2 <- lung >>>> names(lung2)[1] <- "in st" # old name is inst >>>> survdiff(Surv(time, status) ~ `in st`, data=lung2) >>>> Error in `[.data.frame`(m, ll) : undefined columns selected >>>> >>>> In the body of the code the program want to send all of the >>>> right-hand >>>> side variables >>>> forward to the strata() function. The code looks more or less like >>>> this, where m is >>>> the model frame >>>> >>>> Terms <- terms(m) >>>> index <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>> if (length(index) ==0) X <- rep(1L, n) # no coariates >>>> else X <- strata(m[index]) >>>> >>>> For the variable with a space in the name the term.label is "`in >>>> st`", >>>> and the >>>> subscript fails. >>>> >>>> Is this intended behaviour or a bug? The issue is that the name of >>>> this column in the >>>> model frame does not have the backtics, while the terms structure >>>> does >>>> have them. >>>> >>>> Terry T. >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel> >>>> >>>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> [hidden email] mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > ______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
>>>>> Ben Bolker <[hidden email]>
>>>>> on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:42:40 -0500 writes: > Meant to respond to this but forgot. > I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to the > terms() (a vector of the names > of the constructed model matrix), thus preserving the information at > the point when it was available. > I do agree that it would be preferable to have an upstream fix ... did anybody ever propose a small patch to the upstream sources ? -- including a REPREX (or 2: one for lme4, one for survival) I'm open to look at one .. not for the next few days, though. Martin > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > <[hidden email]> wrote: >> Ben, >> >> >> Looking at your notes, it appears that your solution is to write your own >> terms() function >> for lme. It is easy to verify that the "varnames.fixed" attribute is not >> returned by the >> ususal terms function. >> >> Then I also need to write my own terms function for the survival and coxme >> pacakges? >> Because of the need to treat strata() terms in a special way I manipulate >> the >> formula/terms in nearly every routine. >> >> Extrapolating: every R package that tries to examine formulas and partition >> them into bits >> needs its own terms function? This does not look like a good solution to >> me. >> >> On 03/07/2018 07:39 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: >>> >>> I knew I had seen this before but couldn't previously remember where. >>> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/issues/441 ... I initially fixed with >>> gsub(), but (pushed by Martin Maechler to do better) I eventually >>> fixed it by storing the original names of the model frame (without >>> backticks) as an attribute for later retrieval: >>> >>> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/commit/56416fc8b3b5153df7df5547082835c5d5725e89. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks to Bill Dunlap for the clarification. On follow-up it turns out >>>> that >>>> this will be an issue for many if not most of the routines in the >>>> survival >>>> package: a lot of them look at the terms structure and make use of the >>>> dimnames of attr(terms, 'factors'), which also keeps the unneeded >>>> backquotes. Others use the term.labels attribute. To dodge this I will >>>> need to create a fixterms() routine which I call at the top of every >>>> single >>>> routine in the library. >>>> >>>> Is there a chance for a fix at a higher level? >>>> >>>> Terry T. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 03/05/2018 03:55 PM, William Dunlap wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I believe this has to do terms() making "term.labels" (hence the >>>>> dimnames >>>>> of "factors") >>>>> with deparse(), so that the backquotes are included for non-syntactic >>>>> names. The backquotes >>>>> are not in the column names of the input data.frame (nor model frame) so >>>>> you get a mismatch >>>>> when subscripting the data.frame or model.frame with elements of >>>>> terms()$term.labels. >>>>> >>>>> I think you can avoid the problem by adding right after >>>>> ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>>> the line >>>>> ll <- gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>>>> >>>>> E.g., >>>>> >>>>> > d <- data.frame(check.names=FALSE, y=1/(1:5), `b$a$d`=sin(1:5)+2, `x >>>>> y >>>>> z`=cos(1:5)+2) >>>>> > Terms <- terms( y ~ log(`b$a$d`) + `x y z` ) >>>>> > m <- model.frame(Terms, data=d) >>>>> > colnames(m) >>>>> [1] "y" "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>>>> > attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "`x y z`" >>>>> > ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>>> > gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) >>>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" >>>>> >>>>> It is a bit of a mess. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bill Dunlap >>>>> TIBCO Software >>>>> wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel >>>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> A user reported a problem with the survdiff function and the use of >>>>> variables that >>>>> contain a space. Here is a simple example. The same issue occurs >>>>> in >>>>> survfit for the >>>>> same reason. >>>>> >>>>> lung2 <- lung >>>>> names(lung2)[1] <- "in st" # old name is inst >>>>> survdiff(Surv(time, status) ~ `in st`, data=lung2) >>>>> Error in `[.data.frame`(m, ll) : undefined columns selected >>>>> >>>>> In the body of the code the program want to send all of the >>>>> right-hand >>>>> side variables >>>>> forward to the strata() function. The code looks more or less like >>>>> this, where m is >>>>> the model frame >>>>> >>>>> Terms <- terms(m) >>>>> index <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") >>>>> if (length(index) ==0) X <- rep(1L, n) # no coariates >>>>> else X <- strata(m[index]) >>>>> >>>>> For the variable with a space in the name the term.label is "`in >>>>> st`", >>>>> and the >>>>> subscript fails. >>>>> >>>>> Is this intended behaviour or a bug? The issue is that the name of >>>>> this column in the >>>>> model frame does not have the backtics, while the terms structure >>>>> does >>>>> have them. >>>>> >>>>> Terry T. >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________________________ >>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> mailing list >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ______________________________________________ >>>> [hidden email] mailing list >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> >> >> ______________________________________________ >> [hidden email] mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ > [hidden email] mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
On 18-03-08 10:07 AM, Martin Maechler wrote: >>>>>> Ben Bolker <[hidden email]> >>>>>> on Thu, 8 Mar 2018 09:42:40 -0500 writes: > > > Meant to respond to this but forgot. > > I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to the > > terms() (a vector of the names > > of the constructed model matrix), thus preserving the information at > > the point when it was available. > > I do agree that it would be preferable to have an upstream fix ... > > did anybody ever propose a small patch to the upstream sources ? > > -- including a REPREX (or 2: one for lme4, one for survival) > > I'm open to look at one .. not for the next few days, though. > > Martin Didn't get around to it ... a bit worried about doing it 100% back-compatibly, also a bit scared in general of messing with such deep stuff. It could probably done *non*-backward-compatibly simply by changing line 459 of library/stats/R/models.R to varnames <- vapply(vars, function(x) deparse2(x,backtick=FALSE), " ")[-1L] ... ? > > > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > > <[hidden email]> wrote: > >> Ben, > >> > >> > >> Looking at your notes, it appears that your solution is to write your own > >> terms() function > >> for lme. It is easy to verify that the "varnames.fixed" attribute is not > >> returned by the > >> ususal terms function. > >> > >> Then I also need to write my own terms function for the survival and coxme > >> pacakges? > >> Because of the need to treat strata() terms in a special way I manipulate > >> the > >> formula/terms in nearly every routine. > >> > >> Extrapolating: every R package that tries to examine formulas and partition > >> them into bits > >> needs its own terms function? This does not look like a good solution to > >> me. > >> > >> On 03/07/2018 07:39 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: > >>> > >>> I knew I had seen this before but couldn't previously remember where. > >>> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/issues/441 ... I initially fixed with > >>> gsub(), but (pushed by Martin Maechler to do better) I eventually > >>> fixed it by storing the original names of the model frame (without > >>> backticks) as an attribute for later retrieval: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/lme4/lme4/commit/56416fc8b3b5153df7df5547082835c5d5725e89. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > >>> <[hidden email]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Thanks to Bill Dunlap for the clarification. On follow-up it turns out > >>>> that > >>>> this will be an issue for many if not most of the routines in the > >>>> survival > >>>> package: a lot of them look at the terms structure and make use of the > >>>> dimnames of attr(terms, 'factors'), which also keeps the unneeded > >>>> backquotes. Others use the term.labels attribute. To dodge this I will > >>>> need to create a fixterms() routine which I call at the top of every > >>>> single > >>>> routine in the library. > >>>> > >>>> Is there a chance for a fix at a higher level? > >>>> > >>>> Terry T. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 03/05/2018 03:55 PM, William Dunlap wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I believe this has to do terms() making "term.labels" (hence the > >>>>> dimnames > >>>>> of "factors") > >>>>> with deparse(), so that the backquotes are included for non-syntactic > >>>>> names. The backquotes > >>>>> are not in the column names of the input data.frame (nor model frame) so > >>>>> you get a mismatch > >>>>> when subscripting the data.frame or model.frame with elements of > >>>>> terms()$term.labels. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think you can avoid the problem by adding right after > >>>>> ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") > >>>>> the line > >>>>> ll <- gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) > >>>>> > >>>>> E.g., > >>>>> > >>>>> > d <- data.frame(check.names=FALSE, y=1/(1:5), `b$a$d`=sin(1:5)+2, `x > >>>>> y > >>>>> z`=cos(1:5)+2) > >>>>> > Terms <- terms( y ~ log(`b$a$d`) + `x y z` ) > >>>>> > m <- model.frame(Terms, data=d) > >>>>> > colnames(m) > >>>>> [1] "y" "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" > >>>>> > attr(Terms, "term.labels") > >>>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "`x y z`" > >>>>> > ll <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") > >>>>> > gsub("^`|`$", "", ll) > >>>>> [1] "log(`b$a$d`)" "x y z" > >>>>> > >>>>> It is a bit of a mess. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Bill Dunlap > >>>>> TIBCO Software > >>>>> wdunlap tibco.com <http://tibco.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel > >>>>> <[hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> A user reported a problem with the survdiff function and the use of > >>>>> variables that > >>>>> contain a space. Here is a simple example. The same issue occurs > >>>>> in > >>>>> survfit for the > >>>>> same reason. > >>>>> > >>>>> lung2 <- lung > >>>>> names(lung2)[1] <- "in st" # old name is inst > >>>>> survdiff(Surv(time, status) ~ `in st`, data=lung2) > >>>>> Error in `[.data.frame`(m, ll) : undefined columns selected > >>>>> > >>>>> In the body of the code the program want to send all of the > >>>>> right-hand > >>>>> side variables > >>>>> forward to the strata() function. The code looks more or less like > >>>>> this, where m is > >>>>> the model frame > >>>>> > >>>>> Terms <- terms(m) > >>>>> index <- attr(Terms, "term.labels") > >>>>> if (length(index) ==0) X <- rep(1L, n) # no coariates > >>>>> else X <- strata(m[index]) > >>>>> > >>>>> For the variable with a space in the name the term.label is "`in > >>>>> st`", > >>>>> and the > >>>>> subscript fails. > >>>>> > >>>>> Is this intended behaviour or a bug? The issue is that the name of > >>>>> this column in the > >>>>> model frame does not have the backtics, while the terms structure > >>>>> does > >>>>> have them. > >>>>> > >>>>> Terry T. > >>>>> > >>>>> ______________________________________________ > >>>>> [hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]> mailing list > >>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > >>>>> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> ______________________________________________ > >>>> [hidden email] mailing list > >>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > >> > >> > >> ______________________________________________ > >> [hidden email] mailing list > >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > > > ______________________________________________ > > [hidden email] mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel > ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
In reply to this post by bbolker
Ben,
I looked at the source code you pointed out, and the line fr <- fr[attr(terms(fr),"varnames.fixed")] sure looks to me as though the terms() function has returned an object with a varnames.fixed attribute. Either that or your code has inside knowledge that a reader like me won't know. Given what you said I will guess that terms(x) returns the terms attribute of x if that already exists, doing no processing, and you know that fr has already been thusly modified? I have code that uses the variables, term.names, and factors attributes of the terms() structure, and all of those have the backticks. I know the second two will currently break the coxme and survival packages, I haven't chased down the effect on the first. On 03/08/2018 08:42 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: > Meant to respond to this but forgot. > > I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to the > terms() (a vector of the names > of the constructed model matrix), thus preserving the information at > the point when it was available. > I do agree that it would be preferable to have an upstream fix ... > ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
In reply to this post by bbolker
That's more or less right. We wrote a terms.merMod method, which accesses the terms component of the @frame slot, which we have modified upstream ... Do you mean term.labels rather than term.names? BTW ?terms.object says (under the "term.labels" element): Non-syntactic names will be quoted by backticks: this makes it easier to re-construct the formula from the term labels. This suggests, alas, that this was an intentional design decision -- so harder to change. cheers Ben On 18-03-08 11:24 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > Ben, > I looked at the source code you pointed out, and the line > fr <- fr[attr(terms(fr),"varnames.fixed")] > > sure looks to me as though the terms() function has returned an object > with a varnames.fixed attribute. Either that or your code has inside > knowledge that a reader like me won't know. Given what you said I will > guess that terms(x) returns the terms attribute of x if that already > exists, doing no processing, and you know that fr has already been > thusly modified? > > I have code that uses the variables, term.names, and factors attributes > of the terms() structure, and all of those have the backticks. I know > the second two will currently break the coxme and survival packages, I > haven't chased down the effect on the first. > > > On 03/08/2018 08:42 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: >> Meant to respond to this but forgot. >> >> I didn't write a new terms() function -- I added an attribute to the >> terms() (a vector of the names >> of the constructed model matrix), thus preserving the information at >> the point when it was available. >> I do agree that it would be preferable to have an upstream fix ... >> ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel |
Free forum by Nabble - Free Resume Builder | Edit this page |