Quantcast

Partial Likelihood

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Partial Likelihood

doctoratza
Hello everyone,

i would like to ask if everyone knows how to perfom a glm partial likelihood estimation in a time series whrere dependence exists.

lets say that i want to perform a logistic regression for binary data (0, 1) with binary responses which a re the previous days.

for example:


logistic<-glm(dat$Day~dat$Day1+dat$Day2, family=binomial(link="logit"))

where dat$Day (0 or 1) is the current day  and dat$Day1 is one day before (0 or 1).

is it possible that R performs partial likelihood estimation automatically?


thank you in advance

Konstantinos Mammas
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Partial Likelihood

Bert Gunter
Sounds like generalized linear mixed modeling (glmm) to me. Try
posting to the r-sig-mixed-models list rather than here to increase
the likelihood of a useful response.

-- Bert

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:55 AM, doctoratza <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> i would like to ask if everyone knows how to perfom a glm partial likelihood
> estimation in a time series whrere dependence exists.
>
> lets say that i want to perform a logistic regression for binary data (0, 1)
> with binary responses which a re the previous days.
>
> for example:
>
>
> logistic<-glm(dat$Day~dat$Day1+dat$Day2, family=binomial(link="logit"))
>
> where dat$Day (0 or 1) is the current day  and dat$Day1 is one day before (0
> or 1).
>
> is it possible that R performs partial likelihood estimation automatically?
>
>
> thank you in advance
>
> Konstantinos Mammas
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Partial-Likelihood-tp4639159.html
> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



--

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

Internal Contact Info:
Phone: 467-7374
Website:
http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Partial Likelihood

Joshua Wiley-2
In addition to Bert's suggestion of r sig mixed models (which I second), I would encourage you to create a more detailed example and explanation of what you hope to accomplish. Sounds a bit like an auto regressive structure, but more details would be good.

Cheers,

Josh

On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:34, Bert Gunter <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Sounds like generalized linear mixed modeling (glmm) to me. Try
> posting to the r-sig-mixed-models list rather than here to increase
> the likelihood of a useful response.
>
> -- Bert
>
> On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:55 AM, doctoratza <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> i would like to ask if everyone knows how to perfom a glm partial likelihood
>> estimation in a time series whrere dependence exists.
>>
>> lets say that i want to perform a logistic regression for binary data (0, 1)
>> with binary responses which a re the previous days.
>>
>> for example:
>>
>>
>> logistic<-glm(dat$Day~dat$Day1+dat$Day2, family=binomial(link="logit"))
>>
>> where dat$Day (0 or 1) is the current day  and dat$Day1 is one day before (0
>> or 1).
>>
>> is it possible that R performs partial likelihood estimation automatically?
>>
>>
>> thank you in advance
>>
>> Konstantinos Mammas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Partial-Likelihood-tp4639159.html
>> Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> [hidden email] mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bert Gunter
> Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
>
> Internal Contact Info:
> Phone: 467-7374
> Website:
> http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm
>
> ______________________________________________
> [hidden email] mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Partial Likelihood

bbolker
Joshua Wiley <jwiley.psych <at> gmail.com> writes:

>
> In addition to Bert's suggestion of r sig mixed models
> (which I second), I would encourage you to create a
> more detailed example and explanation of what you hope to accomplish.
>  Sounds a bit like an auto regressive
> structure, but more details would be good.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Josh
>
> On Aug 4, 2012, at 9:34, Bert Gunter <gunter.berton <at> gene.com> wrote:
>
> > Sounds like generalized linear mixed modeling (glmm) to me. Try
> > posting to the r-sig-mixed-models list rather than here to increase
> > the likelihood of a useful response.
> >
> > -- Bert
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 3:55 AM, doctoratza <mammas_k <at> live.com> wrote:
> >> Hello everyone,
> >>
> >> i would like to ask if everyone knows how to perfom a glm partial likelihood
> >> estimation in a time series whrere dependence exists.
> >>
> >> lets say that i want to perform a logistic regression for binary data (0, 1)
> >> with binary responses which a re the previous days.
> >>
> >> for example:
> >>
> >>
> >> logistic<-glm(dat$Day~dat$Day1+dat$Day2, family=binomial(link="logit"))
> >>
> >> where dat$Day (0 or 1) is the current day  and dat$Day1 is one day before (0
> >> or 1).

 ... and presumably Day2 is 2 days before?

> >>
> >> is it possible that R performs partial likelihood estimation automatically?
> >>
> >>

  Since it's plausible in this case that the responses are all observed without
error,
I don't necessarily see why you need GLMMs, or anything beyond a regular GLM
fit to do this ... you just need up to set the lagged variables correctly.

As I interpret this question,

  dat <- data.frame(Day=c(Day,rep(NA,2)),Day1=c(NA,Day,NA),Day2=c(NA,NA,Day))
  glm(Day~Day1+Day2,na.action=na.exclude,data=dat,family=binomial)

should work just fine (na.action=na.exclude isn't really necessary -- the
default behavior is to omit NAs -- but this way if you do something like
predictions it will automatically give you NA values for the beginning and
end of the series).

  Autoregression is only hard when the process is observed with error ...

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Partial Likelihood

doctoratza
Thank you for your comment. I suspected that a model with well defined predictors should work fine with a glm procedure.

Thanks again

K
Loading...