|
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Duncan Murdoch <[hidden email]> > To: Amos Folarin <[hidden email]> > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:57 -0400 > Subject: Re: [R] Problems getting html files out of R CMD check > On 11-03-13 7:14 PM, Amos Folarin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There >> seems >> to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file that's >> constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files >> independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files >> without >> complaint. >> > > R doesn't build .html files any more unless you ask it to explicitly, e.g. > using R CMD Rdconv. > > Duncan Murdoch > Thanks Duncan, I guess much of the documentation "out there" still indicate this functionality. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
On 11-03-14 7:32 AM, Amos Folarin wrote:
>> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Duncan Murdoch<[hidden email]> >> To: Amos Folarin<[hidden email]> >> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:57 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [R] Problems getting html files out of R CMD check >> On 11-03-13 7:14 PM, Amos Folarin wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There >>> seems >>> to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file that's >>> constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files >>> independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files >>> without >>> complaint. >>> >> >> R doesn't build .html files any more unless you ask it to explicitly, e.g. >> using R CMD Rdconv. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> > > > > Thanks Duncan, I guess much of the documentation "out there" still indicate > this functionality. If it's R Project documentation, you should tell us about it, and we'll fix it. If you're finding it on a third party website, consider it a warning about the reliability of the source. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
On 14 March 2011 11:43, Duncan Murdoch <[hidden email]> wrote:
> On 11-03-14 7:32 AM, Amos Folarin wrote: > >> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Duncan Murdoch<[hidden email]> >>> To: Amos Folarin<[hidden email]> >>> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:57 -0400 >>> Subject: Re: [R] Problems getting html files out of R CMD check >>> On 11-03-13 7:14 PM, Amos Folarin wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There >>>> seems >>>> to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file >>>> that's >>>> constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files >>>> independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files >>>> without >>>> complaint. >>>> >>>> >>> R doesn't build .html files any more unless you ask it to explicitly, >>> e.g. >>> using R CMD Rdconv. >>> >>> Duncan Murdoch >>> >>> >> >> >> Thanks Duncan, I guess much of the documentation "out there" still >> indicate >> this functionality. >> > > If it's R Project documentation, you should tell us about it, and we'll fix > it. If you're finding it on a third party website, consider it a warning > about the reliability of the source. > > Duncan Murdoch > Yes, I stand warned. But perhaps a heads-up would be useful in the docs (there is some information about this in the vignettes section but I think it's worth including this in the documentation for "R CMD check" to prevent confusion. I suppose implicitly you expect the html to be generated given that the pdf manual is created at this step). [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
|
On 14/03/2011 8:29 AM, Amos Folarin wrote:
> On 14 March 2011 11:43, Duncan Murdoch<[hidden email]> wrote: > > > On 11-03-14 7:32 AM, Amos Folarin wrote: > > > >> > >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>> From: Duncan Murdoch<[hidden email]> > >>> To: Amos Folarin<[hidden email]> > >>> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:53:57 -0400 > >>> Subject: Re: [R] Problems getting html files out of R CMD check > >>> On 11-03-13 7:14 PM, Amos Folarin wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I'm trying to R CMD check a package, however I have hit a snag. There > >>>> seems > >>>> to be a problem with the creation of the /html files (the only file > >>>> that's > >>>> constructed here is the 00Index.html). I've tested each of the .Rd files > >>>> independently with R CMD Rdconv, they all happily create html files > >>>> without > >>>> complaint. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> R doesn't build .html files any more unless you ask it to explicitly, > >>> e.g. > >>> using R CMD Rdconv. > >>> > >>> Duncan Murdoch > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> Thanks Duncan, I guess much of the documentation "out there" still > >> indicate > >> this functionality. > >> > > > > If it's R Project documentation, you should tell us about it, and we'll fix > > it. If you're finding it on a third party website, consider it a warning > > about the reliability of the source. > > > > Duncan Murdoch > > > > Yes, I stand warned. But perhaps a heads-up would be useful in the docs > (there is some information about this in the vignettes section but I think > it's worth including this in the documentation for "R CMD check" to prevent > confusion. I suppose implicitly you expect the html to be generated given > that the pdf manual is created at this step). I don't really see the connection to "R CMD check". This was documented as a change back in the NEWS file for 2.10.0, and as far as I know nothing in the documentation suggests that .html files will ever be produced (unless you ask for them). That seems to me to be the right way to do it: document how things are in the main documentation, and how things have changed in the NEWS. R CMD check creates a pdf manual because sometimes that fails. We don't have an HTML validity checker, so we don't try to check the validity of our generated HTML. Duncan Murdoch ______________________________________________ [hidden email] mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |
