Re: extending lattice to S4 classes

[Deepayan Sarkar]

On 10/20/05, ernesto <[hidden email]> wrote:

[...]

> Hi Deepayan,
>
> I see that there are alternatives, I found one my self that works and
> it's transparent for the user.
>
> I don't want to implement solutions that force the user to use lattice
> methods differently from your implementation.
>
> The cleanest solution as you say is to add a data argument to xyplot but
> I can't do it so I would not propose it.

FYI, I have added the 'data' argument to high level generics in
lattice_0.13-1, available for r-devel (of course this causes the
current version of FLCore to fail).

Deepayan
--
http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~deepayan/

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel

[ernesto-4]

Deepayan Sarkar wrote:

>On 10/20/05, ernesto <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>  
>
>>Hi Deepayan,
>>
>>I see that there are alternatives, I found one my self that works and
>>it's transparent for the user.
>>
>>I don't want to implement solutions that force the user to use lattice
>>methods differently from your implementation.
>>
>>The cleanest solution as you say is to add a data argument to xyplot but
>>I can't do it so I would not propose it.
>>    
>>
>
>FYI, I have added the 'data' argument to high level generics in
>lattice_0.13-1, available for r-devel (of course this causes the
>current version of FLCore to fail).
>
>Deepayan
>--
>http://www.stat.wisc.edu/~deepayan/
>  
>

Hi,

Thanks for your help. I'll deal with it asap.

Regards

EJ

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel