mpfr and gsl problem on SLES11 SP4

Previous Topic Next Topic
 
classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Ger
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

mpfr and gsl problem on SLES11 SP4

Ger
Dear Team,


Maybe somebody already tried to install mpfr and gsl packages for R on SLES.
Exactly I try to install Rmpfr_0.6-1.tar.gz and gsl_1.9-10.3.tar.gz on SLES11 SP4.


These are the available packages from official SLES SDK media:

rtest:/home/ruser # rpm -qa | grep -i gsl

gsl-devel-1.11-1.30

gsl-1.11-1.30

rtest:/home/ruser #


As I understand gsl is from 1.11 till 1.30 level.

rtest:/home/ruser # rpm -qa | grep -i mpfr

libmpfr1-2.3.2-3.118.1

mpfr-devel-2.3.2-3.118.1

rtest:/home/ruser #


GSL installation: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/gsl/index.html
SystemRequirements:
Gnu Scientific Library version >= 1.12

rtest:/home/ruser # R CMD INSTALL gsl_1.9-10.3.tar.gz

* installing to library ‘/usr/local/lib64/R/library’

* installing *source* package ‘gsl’ ...

** package ‘gsl’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked

checking for gsl-config... /usr/bin/gsl-config

checking if GSL version >= 1.12... checking for gcc... gcc

checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out

checking whether the C compiler works... yes

checking whether we are cross compiling... no

checking for suffix of executables...

checking for suffix of object files... o

checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes

checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes

checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed

configure: error: Need GSL version >= 1.12
ERROR: configuration failed for package ‘gsl’

* removing ‘/usr/local/lib64/R/library/gsl’

rtest:/home/ruser #


Rmpfr installation: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rmpfr/index.html
SystemRequirements:
gmp (>= 4.2.3), mpfr (>= 3.0.0)

rtest:/home/ruser # R CMD INSTALL Rmpfr_0.6-1.tar.gz

* installing to library ‘/usr/local/lib64/R/library’

* installing *source* package ‘Rmpfr’ ...

** package ‘Rmpfr’ successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked

checking for gcc... gcc -std=gnu99

checking whether the C compiler works... yes

checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out

checking for suffix of executables...

checking whether we are cross compiling... no

checking for suffix of object files... o

checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes

checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 accepts -g... yes

checking for gcc -std=gnu99 option to accept ISO C89... none needed

checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -std=gnu99 -E

checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep

checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E

checking for ANSI C header files... yes

checking for sys/types.h... yes

checking for sys/stat.h... yes

checking for stdlib.h... yes

checking for string.h... yes

checking for memory.h... yes

checking for strings.h... yes

checking for inttypes.h... yes

checking for stdint.h... yes

checking for unistd.h... yes

checking mpfr.h usability... yes

checking mpfr.h presence... yes

checking for mpfr.h... yes

checking gmp.h usability... yes

checking gmp.h presence... yes

checking for gmp.h... yes

checking for __gmpz_init in -lgmp... yes

checking for mpfr_init in -lmpfr... yes

checking for mpfr_digamma in -lmpfr... no

configure: error: MPFR Library must be at least version 3.0.0, see README

ERROR: configuration failed for package ‘Rmpfr’

* removing ‘/usr/local/lib64/R/library/Rmpfr’

rtest:/home/ruser #


Maybe R detects the packages wrongly ?
Can I edit source to ignore ?
Can I use Rmpfr and gsl with original SLES SDK packages ?


Regards,

Gery

IT Specialist



_________________________________________

Citromail.hu levelezőrendszerből küldve

Lépj be vagy regisztrálj

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

______________________________________________
[hidden email] mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Best Regards,
Gery
IT Specialist